Follow these Thanksgiving tips to ensure your working relationship, like your holiday, ends up being the celebration you envisioned.
Follow these Thanksgiving tips to ensure your working relationship, like your holiday, ends up being the celebration you envisioned.
A single employee was responsible for the entirety of the Desjardins data breach, carrying out an internal attack right under the company’s nose. What more can (and should) an employer do?
What should employees expect when they’re expecting? Patrizia discusses whether it is discriminatory for employers to provide enhanced maternity leave benefits to female employees only.
This past month, the US Women’s National Soccer Team made headlines amid their World Cup run by pushing for pay equality with their counterparts on the men’s team, leading to support from sponsors and the US Senate.
So what is the big deal about gender/sex discrimination in compensation and should Ontario employers be concerned?
What is an employer to do in cases where they have not yet had the chance to build that relationship with a new employee who’s ghosted them?
When it comes to employers navigating human resource issues and relationships with their employees, it’s obvious that “equal” is not the same as “identical”…
The recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in R v. Jarvis addressed the circumstances that give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy. While the case directly considered whether certain recordings violated the Criminal Code, the Court’s broad analysis of when a reasonable expectation of privacy exists applies outside the criminal context, with relevance to employers.
For workplaces that operate with multiple shifts, dealing with employee refusals to change shifts (especially to night shift) happens all too often…
Regardless of your political affiliation, most Ontarians can sympathize with the impact that the short-notice changes will have on children living with autism and on their families and caregivers. These changes have a ripple effect on health care, education, as well as businesses.
In Azur Human Resources Ltd. v. The Minister of Revenue, the Ontario Superior Court considered how workers affiliated with temporary placement agencies ought to be classified, not for the purposes of labour and employment legislation, but for tax purposes under the Employer Health Tax Act (the “EHTA”).
Termination is essentially the capital punishment of discipline in the employment law realm. However, what recourse is available to future employers of these “harassers”?
When you consider how much time people spend at work and in the office, it is not surprising that relationships of all types form amongst individuals in the workplace. But office relationships can also develop into something more.
As someone who was part of the Toronto dating scene until her mid-30s, I can tell you about ghosting, but it was not until last month that I recognized that the phenomenon had spread to other social scenarios, including employment.
On October 25, 2018, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code (harassment and violence), and the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act and the Budget Implementation Act, 2017, No. 1 (the “Act”) received Royal Assent.
As Employment Counsel, I wonder now whether it really is all cocoa and smiles being an employee of Santa Claus. Looking at workplace requirements from an Ontario perspective, Santa the employer may be exposed in a very different light.
Employers who seek to impose more rigorous oversight of new employees and minimize termination obligations to those employees can rely on appropriately drafted probationary limitations in their offers. Learn more by reading this blog.
On November 21, 2018, Bill 47, the Making Ontario Open for Business Act, 2018, received Royal Assent and was officially passed. It undoes many of the changes that the Liberal government introduced in Bill 148, returning to previous legislative language.
First Google and now Wayfair: another employee walkout forces a company to take action. Read on to learn some practical lessons from Google’s global walkout.
In the recent Ontario Superior Court decision Render v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator, Master Andrew Graham found that an employee who claimed that a co-worker sexually harassed her could be granted intervener status at the co-worker’s trial for wrongful dismissal.
Does an offer of continued employment from a buyer constitute ‘consideration’ such that the new employment contract is binding on the employee?